Skip to main content

2016

Posted on

Delaware's Opacity Industry Provides U.S. Onshore Tax Haven


byDavid Kocieniewski (BNA.com)
Chevron Corp. used a shell company in a tax haven to escape hundreds of millions of dollars in Australian taxes, according to a 2015 court ruling. The subsidiary,which allowed Chevron to eliminate Australian taxes on $1.7 billion in profit earned there,wasn't secreted away on a remote tropical islandÔøΩitwas set up in the very mundane localewhere corporate secrecywas born: Delaware.
For the DTR story, gohere. (subscription required)

Posted on

Inversion Rules Build Costly Wall for U.S., Brady Says


by Laura Davison and Kaustuv Basu ( BNA.com)
The Treasury Department's anti-inversion rules build awall that U.S. companieswill have to pay for, Houseways and Means Chairman Kevin Brady (R-Texas) said.
For the DTR story, gohere.(subscription required)

Posted on

Curb on 'Hopscotch' Loan Could be Expandesl, Official Says


by Alison Bennett (BNA.com)
Non-inverted companies could face a crackdown on the use of "hopscotch" loans under tax code Section 956 to shift income out of the U.S.
For the DTR story, gohere.(subscription required)

Posted on

International Tax News - Edition 39

  • By PwC

by PwC

International Tax News is designed to help multinational organisations keep upwith the constant flow of international tax developmentsworldwide.

For the current issue, gohere.

Posted on

EU Study Recommends Reducing Incentives for Agggrssive MNE Tax Planning


Countries seeking to curb tax avoidance by multinational enterprises and high-net-worth households need to reduce incentives for the promotion of aggressive tax planning schemes by financial institutions, according to a draft study released by the European Parliament's TAXE II special committee on tax rulings.
For thewWTD story, gohere. (subscription required)

Posted on

Cash Pooling Impact May Shrink in Earnings-Stripping Rules


by Alison Bennett
Some arrangements that companies use to "pool" cash for use by subsidiaries might get a break in final rules intended to stop companies from shifting income out of the U.S. through tax-favored loans, Treasury and IRS officials said.
For the DTR story, gohere. (subscription required)

Posted on

Time to Rewrite Transfer Pricing Rules After Altera'?


by Alex M. Parker
After its major loss in the case against Altera Corp., is it time for the IRS to rewrite its now 24-year-old transfer pricing regulations?
One practitionerÔøΩand former Internal Revenue Service associate chief counselÔøΩthinks so.
For the DTR story, gohere. (subscription required)

Posted on

News Analysis: Proceeding Directly to an Exit Tax


by Marie Sapirie
Following the release of the earnings stripping regulations, the next action against inversions may be imposing an exit taxwhen corporationswith unrepatriated foreign earnings are acquired by foreign corporations.
For the Tax Notes article, go here. (subscription required)

Posted on

News Analysis: Transfer Pricing Needs a Save Shot


by Lee A. Sheppard
The government recently managed to do everything it could to demolish a sure thing in losingAltera Corp. v. Commissioner, 145 T.C. No. 3 (2015). Around here,we'd like to bewriting the obituary of separate company accounting and transfer pricing, but in the meantime, the IRS has to be able to put on a credible show of enforcement.
For the Tax Notes article, gohere.(subscription required)

Posted on

Germany, Others Questions Public Country-by-Country Reporting


Germany and other European Union members questioned the value of public country-by-country profit and tax reporting, a victory for leading European businesses trying to convince EU states to instead focus their efforts on reducing value-added tax fraud.
For the DTR story, gohere.(subscription required)

Posted on

Professors Say International Tax System Changes Fall Short


by Linda A. Thompson
Tax law professors and consultants from Belgium and the U.K.,who cited recent initiatives to overhaul the international tax system, are calling for a more radical approach.
For the DTR story, gohere.(subscription required)

Posted on

Intangible BEPS Risks


by James J. Tobin
James Tobin of EY looks at how the OECD's base erosion and profit shifting report on transfer pricingwould require that returns on intangible property be "appropriately" attributed to related partieswho actually control and manage the risks or intangibles.
For the BNA Insight, gohere. (subscription required)

Posted on

The Post-BEPS World of Permanent Establishment


by Kevin Cunningham
Kevin Cunningham discusses how the OECD's final base erosion and profit-shifting report on action 7 changed the definition of permanent establishment and the effect that change could have on multinational enterprises.
For the TNI report, go here. (subscription required)

Posted on

Canadian Tax Agency Identifies Ruling for BEPS Exchanges


Canada has identified a range of advance income tax rulings, aswell as advance pricing arrangements in transfer pricing cases, that itwill exchangewith other jurisdictions, consistentwith recommendations under the OECD's project to combat tax base erosion and profit shifting.
For the DTR story, gohere.(Subscription required)

Posted on

Examining the Proposed U.S. Country-by-Country Reporting Regs


by Lewis J. Greenwald & Lucas Giardelli
Lewis J. Greenwald and Lucas Giardelli provide an overview of the proposed U.S. country-by-country reporting regulations and discuss some potential problems that its implementation could present for U.S. taxpayers.
For the TNI viewpoint, go here. (subscription required)

Posted on

When it comes to taxes, theres never been a better time to be a U.S. multinational


by Jim Roumell
Americans are being conned into believing that U.S. corporations are hampered by outsize Taxrates that undermine their competitiveness. Tax inversions,whereby U.S. multinational companies mergewith foreign companies to re-domicile in the partnering company's low- Taxhome country, are the logical result of oppressive U.S. corporate taxrates. Or so the story goes.
For thewashington Post story, gohere.

Posted on

Serial Borrowers From Cash Pools May Be Facing Equity Recast


by Amy S. Eilliot
The principal drafter of arguably the most controversial part of the proposed related-party debt regulations -- the transaction rules, also referred to as the recast rules -- indicated in one of his first speaking engagements on the new rules that the government might not bewilling to exempt cash pooling arrangements from the rules upon finalization.
For the TNT story, go here. (subscription required)

Posted on

Tax authorities adapt to rise of e-commerce (1)


As tax authorities around theworld start to examine how e-commence sales affect their revenue from indirect tax it is important for taxpayers to knowwhat measures are being enforced.


For the ITR story, go here.

Posted on

Stack: IRS Working to Accept Early Country-by-Country Reports


by Alex M. Parker
The IRS isworking to accept voluntary country-by-country reports for the 2016 tax year, a Treasury official says.
Optional 2016 filingsÔøΩif they are accepted by foreign jurisdictionsÔøΩcould smooth over potential "gap year" issues in the implementation of the OECD's country-by-country reporting plan,which taxpayers have said could create huge administrative and privacy headaches.
For the DTR story, gohere.(subscription required)

Posted on

Debt-Equity Breakup Rule Sweeps in the World'


by Laura Davison
Treasury Department officials know that a rule that could split up related-party financing instruments into equity and debt portions is all-encompassing,and arewilling to be convinced it should be narrowed.
For the DTR story, gohere.(subscription required)

Posted on

Practitioners, Officials Hash Out Earnings Stripping Regs


bywilliam R. Davis
Several of the many questions raised about the recently issued earning stripping regulations designed to recharacterize debt as equity in some situationswere addressed by a panel of Treasury officials and practitioners on April 28.
For the TNT story, go here. (subscription required)

Posted on

OECD Urged to Clarify How PE Definition Applies to Servers


by Ali Qassim
The OECD needs to better definewhether companies that use computer servers, such as Google Inc. and Yahoo Inc., have a permanent establishment at the location of the server, according to practitioners at a Dublin tax conference.
For the DTR story, gohere.(subscription required)

Posted on

OECD Sees Roughly 100 Countries Adopting BEPS Changes


by David McAfee
The OECD expects to have about 100 countriesworking together to implement its action plan to combat tax base erosion and profit shifting,whichwill standardize international tax practices, an organization official said.
For the DTR story, gohere.(subscription required)

Posted on

Governments Urged to Use Transfer Pricing Values to Acquire IP


bywilliam Hoke
The U.S. and other countries could go a longway toward minimizing multinational enterprises' tax avoidance by using eminent domain to acquire intellectual property from the companies at the lowballed prices they often declare for transfer pricing purposes, according to a paper beingwritten by the University of Maryland's Andrew Blair-Stanek.
For the TNT story, go here. (subscription required)

Posted on

Stack Calls for More MNE Engagement


by Ryan Finley

Treasury and the IRS areworking toward a solution to the "gap year" problem by allowing optional country-by-country reporting for 2016, but U.S. multinationals can help their own cause by engaging more in the global debate over corporate tax avoidance, according to Robert Stack, Treasury deputy assistant secretary (international tax affairs).

For the TNT story, go here. (subscription required)

Posted on

Integration Plan Is Progressive but Aims to Be Revenue Neutral


A forthcoming corporate integration plan is showing signs that its current designwill raise revenue, but Senate Finance Committee Chair Orrin G. Hatch, R-Utah, said April 21 that hewants the final outcome to be revenue neutral.


For the TNT story, go here. (subcription required)

Posted on

Transfer Pricing Cannot Be Fixed


Tax reform proposalswon't fix our broken corporate tax system. Most proposals suggestwe lower the rates and broaden the base by removing tax expenditures and the interest deduction. Those proposals have merit and seem attractive, but they fail to fix the unfairness of domestic companies paying more tax than multinational enterprises in identical circumstances. This article examines two reform options outlined by Edward D. Kleinbard.


For the Tax Notes viewpoint, go here. (subscription required)

Posted on

It's Time to Revisit the Application of the CUT


In this article, Daniel Falk demonstrates that the requirements of the comparable uncontrolled transaction method regulations are virtually impossible to meetwhen strictly applied, and he discusses potential solutions to the problem.

For the Tax Notes viewpoint, go here. (subscription required)

Posted on

Boustany Seeks Clarity in Meetings on International Reform


Houseways and Means Tax Policy Subcommittee Chair Charlesw. Boustany Jr., R-La., said April 19 that hewill be meeting thisweekwith Republican committee members in order to seek clarity over how to proceedwith international tax reform.


For the TNT story, go here. (subscription required

Posted on

Cash Pooling Viability Debated Following Related-Party Debt Regs


Practitioners on April 26 debated the viability of cash pooling arrangements following the issuance of new proposed regulations thatwould recharacterize some related-party debt as equity.

For the TNT story, gohere.(subscription required)

Posted on

News Analysis: Inversion Regs Will Push States to Tackle Complex Questions


by Brian Bardwell
While it is uncertain how Treasury's new inversion regulationswill play out in the states, practitioners and experts are beginning to focus on how the new treatment of earnings stripping could both prevent revenue losses and maybe even generate new funds.
For the Tax Notes article, go here. (subscription required)

Posted on

News Analysis: Inversion Regs Will Push States to Tackle Complex Questions (1)


by Brian Bardwell
While it is uncertain how Treasury's new inversion regulationswill play out in the states, practitioners and experts are beginning to focus on how the new treatment of earnings stripping could both prevent revenue losses and maybe even generate new funds.
For the Tax Notes article, go here. (subscription required)

Posted on

Action 6 Draft May Deny Benefits Too Broadly, OECD Told


by Kevin A. Bell
A group of U.S. asset managers asked the OECD for guidance addressingwhen non-collective investment vehicle fundsÔøΩ"non-CIV funds"ÔøΩare entitled to tax treaty benefits, raising concerns that the final guidancewouldwrongly deny those benefits to some investors.
For the DTR story, go here. (subscription required)

Posted on

Determining Basis and Other Tax Items of Foreigners


by Jasper L. Cummings, Jr.
In this report, Jack Cummings reprises a perennial area of confusion: Does the code apply to foreign persons before they become relevant to someone's U.S. tax liability? The answer is yes, according to Cummings,who explains how Congress reaffirmedwhat he calls the "universal code principle" in 2015 legislation.
For the Tax Notes special report, go here. (subscription required)

Posted on

Firms Need Tax Plan to Defend IP Hubs From China's Reach


by Kevin A. Bell
U.S. multinational groups need to adopt a multi-pronged transfer pricing strategy to defend their Asian intellectual property hubs, located in jurisdictions such as Singapore, against the scrutiny of China's State Administration of Taxation.
For the DTR story, go here. (subscription required)

Posted on

Sheltering Foreign Profits From U.S. Taxes Is No Big Feat


TheU.S. governmentchalked up a big victory this monthwhen it stopped pharmaceutical giantPfizer Inc. from mergingwithAllergan PLCand shifting its address overseas to avoid U.S. taxes.

But there is at least one thing the Treasury Department still can't do: force Pfizer to book taxes on $80 billion in foreign profits the New York-based company has socked away overseas.

For thewall Street Journal story, go here.

Posted on

Treasury Hasn't Ruled Out Inversion Regs Expansion


by Andrew Velarde
Treasury has not decided against expanding its rules limiting post-inversion planning beyond the scope of inverters, including in the context of hopscotch loans and decontrolling controlled foreign corporations, a Treasury official said April 27.
For the TNT story, go here. (subscription required)

Posted on

Officials Defend Inversion Regs' Lookback Periods


by Ryan Finley
The temporary anti-inversion regulations' rigid lookback periods for including non-ordinary course distributions in the numerator and excluding disqualified stock from the denominator of the ownership fractionwere necessary to distinguish real deals from inversions in an administrableway, according to officials from the IRS and Treasury.
For the TNT story, go here. (subscription required)

Posted on

Turkey introduces 'electronic place of business' concept

  • By ITR Correspondent

Posted on

Cash Pooling Under Microscope in Earnings-Stripping Rules


by Alison Bennett
The Treasury Departmentwants to know a lot more about a common technique used by companies to manage their cashÔøΩknown as "cash pooling"ÔøΩbefore it decideswhether or not that practicewill be swept up under controversial rules to stop companies from "stripping" income out of the U.S.
For the DTR story, gohere. (subscription required)

Posted on

Serial Inverter Ban Could Slow Small-Fish M&As


by Laura Davison
Corporations may pass up chances to engage in mergers and acquisitionswith small and mid-size companies as a result of the Treasury Department's recent anti-inversion guidance that restricts overseas companies from buying domestic ones, an investment banker said.
For the DTR story, go here. (subscription required)

Posted on

Senators Testing Ideas to Clear Way for 2017 Tax Overhaul


by Laura Davison and Kaustav Basu
Senators used a hearing on business taxes as a forum to test-drive their ideas on tax overhaulwhile gaugingwhat might be possible next year.
Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin G. Hatch (R-Utah) pushed his corporate integration idea, ranking member Ronwyden (D-Ore.) explained his reasons for trying to simplify how businesses depreciate assets and Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) said itwould be easiest to do an international overhaul first.
For the DTR story, go here. (subscription required)

Posted on

Uncertainty Over Effective Tax Rate Top Factor for Companies


by Kevin A. Bell
An Oxford University study found that corporate tax officials are more concerned about uncertainty over their companies' effective tax rates than about tax rates themselves.
For the DTR story, go here. (subscription required)

Posted on

Plenty of Authority for Earnings-Stripping Rules, Officials Say


by Alison Bennett
Treasury Department and IRS officials vigorously defended the government's authority to issue rules curbing corporate shifting of income out of the U.S. through loans to U.S. subsidiaries in a practice called earnings stripping.
For the DTR story, go here. (subscription required)

Posted on

Testimony before the Committee on Finance - Statement of James R. Hines Jr.


by James R. Hines Jr.
Targeted reforms such as moving to a territorial tax system are more likely to be effective than cutting business tax expenditures to fund rate cuts, and integrating corporate and individual taxes could also improve efficiency and equity, James R. Hines Jr. of the University of Michigan said at an April 26 Senate Finance Committee hearing.
For the testimony, go here.

Posted on

South Africa issues draft country-by-country reporting standards

  • By PwC

by PwC
The South African Revenue Services (SARS) and Ministry of Finance on April 11, 2016, published draft regulations that specify country-by-country (CbC) reporting standards for multinational enterprises (MNEs). The draft release follows legislative advances in South Africa related to the OECD's Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) initiative, specifically Action 13: Guidance on the Implementation of Transfer Pricing Documentation and Country-by-Country Reporting.
For the PwC Insight, gohere.

Posted on

Troubling Implications of the BEPS Project: Interest Deductibility

  • By FEI Daily Staff

On October 5, 2015, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) issued final tax policy recommendations stemming from its Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) project.


The reports, endorsed by the G20 Finance Ministers on October 8 and by the G20 leaders at their November 15-16 summit, consist primarily of recommendations for significant policy changes that affect fundamental elements of the framework used by OECD member countries to tax international activities.


These recommendations are designed to be implemented as changes to domestic law aswell as through treaty provisions. The OECD has an expectation that the suggested ruleswill be "implemented accordingly" by the countries that participated in the BEPS project.


For the Financial Executives Institute report, go here.On October 5, 2015, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) issued final tax policy recommendations stemming from its Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) project.


The reports, endorsed by the G20 Finance Ministers on October 8 and by the G20 leaders at their November 15-16 summit, consist primarily of recommendations for significant policy changes that affect fundamental elements of the framework used by OECD member countries to tax international activities.


These recommendations are designed to be implemented as changes to domestic law aswell as through treaty provisions. The OECD has an expectation that the suggested ruleswill be "implemented accordingly" by the countries that participated in the BEPS project.


For the Financial Executives Institute report, go here.

Posted on

Corporate Tactics to Avoid Taxes


Diana Furchtgott-Roth compares a United States-based multinational and a foreign-based multinational investing $100 billion inwisconsin. She argues that the American tax system is biased against the United States-based multinational because it has to pay $35 billion in tax to bring $100 billion home from overseas,while the foreign multinational does not have to pay to invest in the United States.

This comparison is misleading at best.

For the New York Times letter, go here.

Posted on

China Hopes Big Tax Overhaul Will Boost Growth

  • By Bloomberg

China's biggest tax overhaul in more than two decades starts May 1,with changes set to reduce the burden on services companies and encourage factories to upgrade and innovate.

For the DTR story, go here. (subscription required)

Posted on

Nigerian Tax Appeal Tribunal determines imported broadband services are subject to VAT

  • By PwC

The Nigerian Tax Appeal Tribunal (Lagos TAT) on February 12 2016, in Vodacom Business Nigeria Ltd v. Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS), held that a Nigerian company that receives broadband services from a non-resident company must account for and pay value added tax (VAT) on those services. The TAT also held that because the non-resident company that provided the servicewas not bound by the VAT Act, the Nigerian company that received the service must self-charge and remit the VAT.

For the PwC Insight, go here.

Back to top