Skip to main content

Fresh Ideas Emerge for New EU Budget Levies

The European Parliament is considering new EU own resources that would tax online gambling, speculative real estate investment, and large companies through a turnover-based CORE contribution. The proposals expose significant legal and institutional constraints, including unanimity requirements, subsidiarity limits, especially for gambling, and unresolved questions about where digitally delivered activity should be taxed. Academic analysis warned that CORE could lead to multiple counting within corporate groups and impose tax liabilities that are disconnected from profitability, raising concerns about neutrality, legal characterization, and enforceability.  

To read more, go here

Crypto Taxation: Challenges in Defining and Regulating Digital Assets in the EU and Beyond

  • By Sahibzada Ahmed Ali Khan

This paper examines the tax treatment of crypto-assets in the European Union and compares the EU approach with developments in the United Kingdom, United States, Singapore, and the UAE. It focuses on the gap between harmonised financial regulation under MiCA and fragmented tax rules across jurisdictions, with particular attention to DAC8, the OECD Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework, classification problems, enforcement gaps intensified by anonymity and decentralised finance, and divergent implementation rules.

To read the full article, click here.

Who Taxes Your Salary When You Work From Home? International Tax Treaties and Cross-Border Telework

  • By Charles Edward Andrew Lincoln IV

This article examines how international tax treaties allocate taxing rights over dependent employment income in an era of remote work, frontier work, and digital mobility. Focusing on Article 15 of the OECD Model Tax Convention, the author argues that existing rules are no longer adequate for cross-border telework and proposes a reform based on the Ottawa Taxation Framework and labor neutrality principles.

To read the full article, click here.

Who Bears the Burden of Digital Services Taxes?

  • By Işın Acun
  • By Johannes Kasinger
  • By Nadia Abou Nabout

This paper examines the incidence of digital services taxes imposed on large digital platforms, focusing on whether the burden is borne by platforms or passed on to advertisers through higher advertising prices. Using Google Ads data across 29 European countries, the authors find that advertisers bear a substantial share of the tax burden, with evidence of near-complete pass-through through higher effective costs per click.

To read the full article, click here.

Fundamentals of Indirect Taxation

  • By Pasquale Pistone
  • By João Félix Pinto Nogueira
  • By Fabiola Annacondia
  • By Craig West
  • By Alessandro Turina
  • By Pedro Schoueri
  • By Ivan Lazarov
  • By Sergio Messina
  • By Sam van der Vlugt

This volume provides a comparative overview of major transaction-based taxes, including VAT/GST, customs duties, tariffs, excise duties, environmental taxes, digital services taxes, and taxes on capital transfers. It situates indirect taxation in a global context by drawing on examples from multiple jurisdictions and referencing OECD, IMF, UN, and EU standards, with attention to the challenges posed by digitalization, globalization, and environmental policy.

To read the full article, click here.

Navigating the Amazon: The Incidence of Digital Service Taxes

  • By Dominika Langenmayr
  • By Rohit Reddy Muddasani

This paper examines the incidence of digital service taxes, focusing on how such taxes affect prices and tax burdens in platform markets such as Amazon. By studying who ultimately bears the cost of taxes imposed on large digital platforms, the paper contributes to debates over the economic effects of unilateral digital tax measures.

To read the full article, click here.

Shrinking Tax Sovereignty In Canada? Evidence from the Income Tax Act

  • By Jinyan Li
  • By Angelo Nikolakakis

This paper examines whether Canada’s tax sovereignty has narrowed as domestic legislation increasingly responds to international tax coordination and cross-border tax challenges. It uses changes to the Income Tax Act to consider how far national tax autonomy may be constrained by external pressures, coordinated standards, and the need to respond to international tax planning.

To read the full article, click here.

Retaliatory Taxation and the Birth of America's First Tax Treaty

  • By Wei Cui

This article examines the historical origins of retaliatory taxation in the United States and its relationship to the development of America’s first tax treaty. Cui uses newly examined historical materials to show how retaliatory tax measures and treaty-based cooperation emerged as competing approaches to international tax conflict.

To read the full article, click here.

Global Tax for Repair

  • By Jay Butler

Jay Butler, Global Tax for Repair, 59 NYU J. Int’l Law & Pol. ____ (forthcoming 2027).

This article examines whether the OECD’s Global Minimum Tax can serve as a vehicle for cross-border reparations and corrective justice. Butler argues that companies within the GMT’s scope may use their discretion over where minimum tax is paid to respond to historical harms, including reparations for slavery. The article reframes global tax planning as a question not only of revenue allocation, but also of redistribution, corporate social responsibility, and repair.

To read the full article, click here.

Notice 2026-23, 2026-2027 Priority Guidance Plan

  • By Jeffery M. Kadet

This submission to Treasury and the IRS recommends priority guidance projects in several international tax areas for the 2026–2027 Priority Guidance Plan. The comments focus on profit-shifting structures and call for updated guidance on effectively connected income, income sourcing, entity classification, subpart F, cost sharing agreements, transfer pricing, and treaty abuse. Kadet argues that clearer and more modernized rules would help the IRS address shifted profits more effectively and reduce uncertainty for taxpayers.

To read the full article, click here.

Trade Agreements and Domestic Policy under Variable Markups

  • By Rui Pan
Download File

This article looks at how trade agreements affect domestic policy when firms set prices with variable markups. It walks through how those international rules can end up shaping tax and regulatory decisions at the national level, especially when governments are trying to balance trade commitments with their own fiscal priorities. It also touches on what that means for competitiveness across borders and the practical difficulty of lining up international obligations with domestic policy goals.

To read the full article, click here.

Back to top