Int'l Tax News
Posted on
Tax Treaties: OECD Tax Leader Says BEPS Project Could Produce New Multilateral Treaty
An international project on base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) could culminate in a new multilateral treaty toautomatically revise some 3,000 existing bilateral double-tax treatiesworldwide to address BEPS, and the project could be completed in two years, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development's top tax official said May 30.
Pascal Saint-Amans, head of OECD's Center for Tax Policy and Administration, made his comments during OECD's annual May 29-30 ministerial council meeting,which produced a declaration urging the Committee on Fiscal Affairs, the organization's key tax decision body, to quickly complete itswork on an action plan for addressing BEPS to deliver to the Group of 20 Finance Ministers meeting July 18-19 in Moscow.
For the story, go here. (Subscription required.)
Pascal Saint-Amans, head of OECD's Center for Tax Policy and Administration, made his comments during OECD's annual May 29-30 ministerial council meeting,which produced a declaration urging the Committee on Fiscal Affairs, the organization's key tax decision body, to quickly complete itswork on an action plan for addressing BEPS to deliver to the Group of 20 Finance Ministers meeting July 18-19 in Moscow.
For the story, go here. (Subscription required.)
Posted on
Practitioner Argues Against U.N. Role in Transfer Pricing Guidance
The United Nations should get out of the business of setting international transfer pricing standards, according to David Ernick of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
Speaking May 30 at a District of Columbia Bar Taxation Section luncheon on current developments in transfer pricing in India and China, Ernick, a former Treasury official, noted that the U.N. claims that its Practical Manual on Transfer Pricing for Developing Countries is consistentwith OECD guidelines.
Ifwhat the U.N. says is true, "why duplicate the effort?" Ernick asked. If, however, the U.N. guidance is inconsistentwith OECD standards, then the U.N. guidancewill result in multiple standards, double taxation, and barriers to trade and investment, argued Ernick.
For the story, go here. (Subscription required.)
Speaking May 30 at a District of Columbia Bar Taxation Section luncheon on current developments in transfer pricing in India and China, Ernick, a former Treasury official, noted that the U.N. claims that its Practical Manual on Transfer Pricing for Developing Countries is consistentwith OECD guidelines.
Ifwhat the U.N. says is true, "why duplicate the effort?" Ernick asked. If, however, the U.N. guidance is inconsistentwith OECD standards, then the U.N. guidancewill result in multiple standards, double taxation, and barriers to trade and investment, argued Ernick.
For the story, go here. (Subscription required.)
Posted on
Future U.N. Transfer Pricing Manual Likely to Address Intangibles
Future editions of the U.N. Manual on Transfer Pricing for Developing Countrieswill likely include a chapter on intangibles, a member of the committee responsible for drafting the manual said May 29.
"I assume the next membership of the committeewill consider to include some additional explanation or guidance in the area of intangibles," said Stig Sollund, a member of the U.N. Committee of Experts on International Cooperation in Tax Matters, at a meeting in New York to officially release the final version of the manual.
Sollund added that before acting on intangibles, the next Committee of Experts shouldwait to seewhat comes out of the OECD's project on base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS). Services and cross-contribution agreements could also be addressed in a future transfer pricing manual, he said.
For the story, go here. (Subscription required.)
"I assume the next membership of the committeewill consider to include some additional explanation or guidance in the area of intangibles," said Stig Sollund, a member of the U.N. Committee of Experts on International Cooperation in Tax Matters, at a meeting in New York to officially release the final version of the manual.
Sollund added that before acting on intangibles, the next Committee of Experts shouldwait to seewhat comes out of the OECD's project on base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS). Services and cross-contribution agreements could also be addressed in a future transfer pricing manual, he said.
For the story, go here. (Subscription required.)
Posted on
Irish Official 'Absolutely Refutes' Senate Tax Haven Accusations and Apple Special Tax Deal Claims
An Irish government official on May 30 said she "absolutely refutes" recent accusations from members of a Senate subcommittee that Ireland is a tax haven and that the Irish government negotiated a special tax dealwith Apple Inc.
"There's no special tax dealwith Apple, and in fact, the CEO of Apple [Tim Cook] yesterday clarified on the record that therewere no special deals," Lucinda Creighton, Ireland's minister for European affairs, told Tax Analysts. Creighton,who is in the United States for four days to speakwith business and political leaders, spoke after an event hosted by the European Institute inwashington.
For the article, go here. (Subscription required.)
"There's no special tax dealwith Apple, and in fact, the CEO of Apple [Tim Cook] yesterday clarified on the record that therewere no special deals," Lucinda Creighton, Ireland's minister for European affairs, told Tax Analysts. Creighton,who is in the United States for four days to speakwith business and political leaders, spoke after an event hosted by the European Institute inwashington.
For the article, go here. (Subscription required.)
Posted on
OECD Official Calls for Mechanism to Quickly Implement BEPS Tax Changes
A mechanism is needed to quickly implement international tax changes related to the OECD base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) project, an OECD official told the U.N. Economic and Social Council at a May 29 meeting in New York on international cooperation in tax matters.
Because of the sheer number of tax treaties in effect, it takes a considerable amount of time for changes to be implemented, said Marlies de Ruiter, head of the tax treaty, transfer pricing, and financial transactions division of the OECD's Centre for Tax Policy and Administration.
For the story, go here. (Subscription required.)
Because of the sheer number of tax treaties in effect, it takes a considerable amount of time for changes to be implemented, said Marlies de Ruiter, head of the tax treaty, transfer pricing, and financial transactions division of the OECD's Centre for Tax Policy and Administration.
For the story, go here. (Subscription required.)
Posted on
Tax Reform Revenue-Neutral Corporate Tax Proposals Will Boost U.S. Economy, CEA's Krueger Says
President Obama's proposals for corporate tax reform can be done in a revenue-neutralway andwould be good for the U.S. economy,white House Council of Economic Advisers Chairman Alan Krueger told BNA May 29.
For the story, go here. (Subscription required.)
For the story, go here. (Subscription required.)
Posted on
Economic Analysis: The Other Problem With Cost Sharing
Investors are entitled to a return on their investment.
This simple and indisputable assertion is the crux of the argument made by multiple commentators regarding the June 2012 OECD discussion draft on transfer pricing of intangibles. (The 1,013 pages of comments are available at http://www.oecd.org.) The source of their concern is the discussion draft's statement that the mere fact that a related party shares the costs of developing assets does not entitle it to the returns on that asset:
Working Party No. 6 delegates [the group of member country officials studying cross-border taxation of intangibles] are uniformly of the view that transfer pricing outcomes in cases involving intangibles should reflect the functions performed, assets used, and risks assumed by the parties. This suggests that neither legal ownership, nor the bearing of costs related to intangible development, taken separately or together, entitles an entitywithin [a multinational enterprise] group to retain the benefits or returnswith respect to the intangibleswithout more.
For the article, go here. (Subscription required.)
This simple and indisputable assertion is the crux of the argument made by multiple commentators regarding the June 2012 OECD discussion draft on transfer pricing of intangibles. (The 1,013 pages of comments are available at http://www.oecd.org.) The source of their concern is the discussion draft's statement that the mere fact that a related party shares the costs of developing assets does not entitle it to the returns on that asset:
Working Party No. 6 delegates [the group of member country officials studying cross-border taxation of intangibles] are uniformly of the view that transfer pricing outcomes in cases involving intangibles should reflect the functions performed, assets used, and risks assumed by the parties. This suggests that neither legal ownership, nor the bearing of costs related to intangible development, taken separately or together, entitles an entitywithin [a multinational enterprise] group to retain the benefits or returnswith respect to the intangibleswithout more.
For the article, go here. (Subscription required.)
Posted on
News Analysis: What Treasury Should Say to Multinationals
In news analysis, Lee A. Sheppard proposes a memorandum that Treasury should send to U.S. multinationals explaining that the international consensus on transfer pricing issues is changing.
For the article, go here. (Subscription required.)
For the article, go here. (Subscription required.)
Posted on
News Analysis: Apple's Tax Magic
We're not easily shocked by transfer pricing practices that the U.S. government accepts, for better orworse. Google? It's pretty clean under U.S. law -- an advance pricing agreement to get the intellectual property out of the United States, and 2,000 employees in Ireland. Dell? Yawn -- lots of U.S. multinationals have commissionaire structures for selling in Europe.
But Apple's planning, as described in the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations (PSI) report, is a special case.we're talking grossworldwide revenues the size of the California state budget, and no tax being paid anywhere on a huge chunk of profits.what is truly surprising about the Apple case is its brazenness. PSI concluded that Apple's self-serving intercompany contracts had no effect on its business practices.
For the story, go here. (Subscription required.)
But Apple's planning, as described in the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations (PSI) report, is a special case.we're talking grossworldwide revenues the size of the California state budget, and no tax being paid anywhere on a huge chunk of profits.what is truly surprising about the Apple case is its brazenness. PSI concluded that Apple's self-serving intercompany contracts had no effect on its business practices.
For the story, go here. (Subscription required.)
Posted on
To keep corporations here, fix the tax code Read more: http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/opinion/oped/bs-ed-apple-20130523,0,1325651.story#ixzz2UczWv692
The report of Apple avoiding corporate income taxes the past four years signals it's time to overhaul the U.S. corporate tax code.
Like many multinationalswith strong intellectual property, Apple legally earns nearly all of its income offshore. The U.S. tax code requires payment of corporate income taxes on domestic operations, but foreign earnings are not taxed until they are returned to the U.S. parent company, an act called repatriation. According to Senate investigators, Apple has structured its foreign operations to avoid a foreign income tax liability aswell. As a result, its foreign earningswould incur a significant repatriation tax, leading those earnings to essentially be "trapped" overseas.
For the article, go here.
Like many multinationalswith strong intellectual property, Apple legally earns nearly all of its income offshore. The U.S. tax code requires payment of corporate income taxes on domestic operations, but foreign earnings are not taxed until they are returned to the U.S. parent company, an act called repatriation. According to Senate investigators, Apple has structured its foreign operations to avoid a foreign income tax liability aswell. As a result, its foreign earningswould incur a significant repatriation tax, leading those earnings to essentially be "trapped" overseas.
For the article, go here.
Posted on
A Is for Avoidance
Even before lastweek's Senate hearing on Apple, itwas clear that the aggressive use of tax havens and other tax avoidance tactics had become standard operating procedure for global American companies.
Microsoft and Hewlett-Packardwere the focus of a similar Senate hearing last September,while Google, Amazon and Starbucks have drawn recent scrutiny in Europe. And, of course, there is General Electric,which achieved a perfect zero on its United States tax bill in 2010. In fact, G.E.was reputed to have theworld's best tax avoidance department until Apple came alongwith tactics to stash some $100 billion in Irelandwithout paying taxes on much of it anywhere in theworld and, apparently,without breaking any law.
And that is the problem. Rampant corporate tax avoidance may not be illegal, but that doesn't make it right or fair.
For the editorial, go here.
Posted on
CAPITAL IDEAS: Who Will Crack the Code?
Ireland and Singapore have no natural resources that make them obvious places to manufacture the concentrate used in soda, nor have they developed innovative new soda-making techniques. Yet they have nonetheless become global capitals for making soft-drink concentrate.
What Ireland and Singapore share is a low corporate tax rate. And because soda is such a simple product,with so much of its financial value stemming from the concentrate, Coke and Pepsi can reduce their overall tax rates by manufacturing it in low-tax countries.
For the story, go here.
What Ireland and Singapore share is a low corporate tax rate. And because soda is such a simple product,with so much of its financial value stemming from the concentrate, Coke and Pepsi can reduce their overall tax rates by manufacturing it in low-tax countries.
For the story, go here.
Posted on
Google defends taxes in face of Labour onslaught
Eric Schmidt defended Google's tax practices onwednesday and said the internet groupwould continue to invest in the UKno matterwhat after Ed Miliband, Labour leader, criticised the company for going toextraordinary lengths to avoid paying tax.
The Google executive chairman said that itwas up to governments, not companies, to set tax rules. He told the audience at the company'sBig Tent conference near London that he supported David Cameron's pledge to begin inter-governmental talks to overhaul the global tax system at next month's G8 summit.
For the story, go here.
The Google executive chairman said that itwas up to governments, not companies, to set tax rules. He told the audience at the company'sBig Tent conference near London that he supported David Cameron's pledge to begin inter-governmental talks to overhaul the global tax system at next month's G8 summit.
For the story, go here.
Posted on
Ireland pledges co-operation on global tax avoidance plan
Ireland's prime minister insisted onwednesday that his country does not cut special dealswith foreign companies to help them avoid taxes and said Dublinwill continue toworkwith the EU and international authorities to set up a global regime to fight tax avoidance.
Enda Kenny said EU authorities have not asked about Ireland's tax treatment of Apple or other multinational companies in spite of thisweek's report by US Senate investigators alleging the California-based computer group used Irish tax loopholes to avoid billions in US taxes.
For the story, go here.
Enda Kenny said EU authorities have not asked about Ireland's tax treatment of Apple or other multinational companies in spite of thisweek's report by US Senate investigators alleging the California-based computer group used Irish tax loopholes to avoid billions in US taxes.
For the story, go here.
Posted on
Apple tax probe helps drive to build consensus on global regime
The US Senate's probe of Apple's tax affairs thisweek injected renewed urgency into the global effort to crack down on aggressive tax avoidance,whichwill feature high on the agenda of the G8 summit meeting in Northern Ireland next month.
Allegations that Apple avoided billions of dollars of taxes shone a harsh spotlight on the international tax system and pushed Ireland on to the defensive after claims that the company had cut a deal to pay a 2 per cent corporate tax rate. Meanwhile British politicians renewed their attack on Google's tax planning, provoking Eric Schmidt, chairman of Google, to describe the international tax rules asirrational and express support for the global reform effort.
For the story, go here.
Allegations that Apple avoided billions of dollars of taxes shone a harsh spotlight on the international tax system and pushed Ireland on to the defensive after claims that the company had cut a deal to pay a 2 per cent corporate tax rate. Meanwhile British politicians renewed their attack on Google's tax planning, provoking Eric Schmidt, chairman of Google, to describe the international tax rules asirrational and express support for the global reform effort.
For the story, go here.
Posted on
EU rushes out corporate tax transparency law
Big companies tax affairs in Europe are to be opened up to greater public scrutinywith the EU rushing out a law compelling them to reveal corporate profits and taxes on a country-by-country basis.
Amid a political furore over allegations of tax avoidance by corporate-giants such as Apple , Starbucks and Google, the EU is extending transparency reforms for banks and resources groups to all large public and private companies.
For the story, go here.
Amid a political furore over allegations of tax avoidance by corporate-giants such as Apple , Starbucks and Google, the EU is extending transparency reforms for banks and resources groups to all large public and private companies.
For the story, go here.
Posted on
Explaining Apples Irish Tax Dodge
The outrageous part about Apple Inc. (AAPL)'s audacious tax strategies isntwhether they are legal. They maywell be. More upsetting are the ruses and contrivances that Apple (AAPL) used to pull them off.
For the story, go here.
For the story, go here.
Posted on
Not a rotten Apple
You know theworld's gone madwhen I think Rand Paul is the only onewho made sense at Tuesday's Senate grilling of Apple chief executive Tim Cook. Cook's crime? Making sure his firm pays as little in taxes as the law allows.
Paul said hewas "offended by the spectacle of dragging in executives from an American company for doing nothing illegal." If you saw the front-page headlines in every major newspaper pegged to the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigation's report, youwould be forgiven for thinking Cookwas ushered straight from the hearing to jail.
Why arewe publicly browbeating an iconic U.S. firm in an era inwhichwe should be encouraging every innovative company to locate and expand high-valuework in America?what kind of message do such hearings send to firms overseas (or U.S.-based multinationalsweighing their capital plans) about America being open for business and hungry for job-creating investment?
For the story, go here.
Paul said hewas "offended by the spectacle of dragging in executives from an American company for doing nothing illegal." If you saw the front-page headlines in every major newspaper pegged to the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigation's report, youwould be forgiven for thinking Cookwas ushered straight from the hearing to jail.
Why arewe publicly browbeating an iconic U.S. firm in an era inwhichwe should be encouraging every innovative company to locate and expand high-valuework in America?what kind of message do such hearings send to firms overseas (or U.S.-based multinationalsweighing their capital plans) about America being open for business and hungry for job-creating investment?
For the story, go here.
Posted on
The Corporate Tax Dodge
While a Senate report detailing Apple's aggressive tax sheltering of billions of dollars of overseas income grabbed headlines thisweek, little noticewas paid to a surreptitious thrust at tax minimization thatwas announced at nearly the same moment.
For the story, go here.
For the story, go here.
Posted on
Op-Ed: Here Comes the sun
Among the many things Tim Cook apparently learned at the knee of Steve Jobs, during his long tenure as Apple's No. 2,was how to create a ''reality distortion field.'' Or so itwould appear afterwatching Cook, now Apple's chief executive, testify on Tuesday at a Senate hearing on the company's tax avoidance schemes.
For the article, go here.
For the article, go here.
Posted on
The Corrosive Effect of Apples Tax Avoidance
The shameful thing about Apple Inc.'s ability to structure its business to avoid United States taxeswas not that it did it. In fact, as Apple executives tried to point out at the Senate hearing atwhich their tax strategieswere detailed, they could have chosen to pay much less in American taxes than they did.
The shameful thing is thatwe have a tax system that seems to allow multinational companies to choosewhat theywant to pay.
For the story, go here.
The shameful thing is thatwe have a tax system that seems to allow multinational companies to choosewhat theywant to pay.
For the story, go here.
Posted on
Levin Says Tax Changes Should Focus on Unjustified Breaks
Democratic Senator Carl Levin said an overhaul of the U.S. tax codewould be difficult to accomplish and instead lawmakers should focus on curbingunjustified tax breaks.
“Corporate tax reform is going to be very, very difficult if youre looking at the legitimate deductions, because there's a reason for those deductions, Levin said at a Bloomberg Government breakfast today.They serve an economic purpose so the economic interests thatwere able to get those passed, put into law, are going to fight very hard to keep those deductions.
For the story, go here.
“Corporate tax reform is going to be very, very difficult if youre looking at the legitimate deductions, because there's a reason for those deductions, Levin said at a Bloomberg Government breakfast today.They serve an economic purpose so the economic interests thatwere able to get those passed, put into law, are going to fight very hard to keep those deductions.
For the story, go here.
Posted on
Apple Tax Rate Ignores Profit Shifting Offshore
Apple Inc. (AAPL) Chief Executive Officer Tim Cook provided a figure to Congress on Tuesday that U.S. companies rarely disclose: its federal tax bill. Apple paid $6 billion last year -- a rate of 30.5 percent.
“That's more than $16 million each day, Cook said.We pay all the taxeswe owe -- every single dollar.
While nobody at the hearing questioned the figure, it provides a distorted picture of Apple's total tax burden. Based on its public filings, the company pays just under 14 percent of its income in taxesworldwide, according to Scott D. Dyreng, an assistant professor of accounting at Duke University's business schoolwhose research specializes in the actual tax rates of large U.S. companies.
For the story, go here.
“That's more than $16 million each day, Cook said.We pay all the taxeswe owe -- every single dollar.
While nobody at the hearing questioned the figure, it provides a distorted picture of Apple's total tax burden. Based on its public filings, the company pays just under 14 percent of its income in taxesworldwide, according to Scott D. Dyreng, an assistant professor of accounting at Duke University's business schoolwhose research specializes in the actual tax rates of large U.S. companies.
For the story, go here.
Posted on
Apples Tax Magic Leaves Irish Bondholders Unmoved: Euro Credit
As Ireland's leaders try to limit the fallout from the tax crossfire between Apple Inc. (AAPL) and U.S. politicians, bond markets suggest they dont have toworry.
Speaking to lawmakers in Dublin two days ago, Finance Minister Michael Noonan insisted the country is no tax haven, a day after a congressional hearing inwashington focused attention on Apple Inc.'s manoeuvers to minimize its tax bill through its operations in Cork in the south of Ireland.
“Maybe therewas a magician, said Noonan, adding that Ireland didntwant to be awhipping boy for misunderstandings over Apple's tax liabilities.But the magicianwasnt resident down in Cork.
For the story, go here.
Speaking to lawmakers in Dublin two days ago, Finance Minister Michael Noonan insisted the country is no tax haven, a day after a congressional hearing inwashington focused attention on Apple Inc.'s manoeuvers to minimize its tax bill through its operations in Cork in the south of Ireland.
“Maybe therewas a magician, said Noonan, adding that Ireland didntwant to be awhipping boy for misunderstandings over Apple's tax liabilities.But the magicianwasnt resident down in Cork.
For the story, go here.
Posted on
From Google to FedEx: The Incredible Vanishing Subsidiary
Some of the biggest U.S. companies, including Google Inc. and FedEx Corp., have quietly removed hundreds of offshore subsidiaries from their publicly disclosed financial filings over the past several years.
Software maker Oracle Corp., for instance, disclosed more than 400 subsidiaries in its 2010 annual report. By 2012 the list had beenwhittled to eight -- five ofwhichwere located in Ireland. Oracle declined to comment.
The vanishing subsidiaries don't stem from asset sales or corporate restructuring. Companies across industries say they are taking advantage of Securities and Exchange Commission rules that demand disclosure onlywhen subsidiary operations are "significant."
For the story, go here.
Software maker Oracle Corp., for instance, disclosed more than 400 subsidiaries in its 2010 annual report. By 2012 the list had beenwhittled to eight -- five ofwhichwere located in Ireland. Oracle declined to comment.
The vanishing subsidiaries don't stem from asset sales or corporate restructuring. Companies across industries say they are taking advantage of Securities and Exchange Commission rules that demand disclosure onlywhen subsidiary operations are "significant."
For the story, go here.
Posted on
Don't Blame Apple for America's Broken Tax Code
On Tuesday, Apple CEO Tim Cook testified in front of the Congressional Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations as a part of their look into the company's corporate tax practices according to Sen. Carl Levin, the chairman of the committee, "Apple successfully sought the holy grail of tax avoidance. It has created offshore entities holding tens of billions of dollarswhile claiming to be tax resident nowhere." I asked Mihir A. Desai, a professor and dean at Harvard Business School, a professor at Harvard Law School, and the author of a 2012 HBR article on taxing businesses, a few questions about how this investigation fits into a larger debate about the corporate tax code. Our edited conversation is below.
For the interview, go here.
For the interview, go here.
Posted on
Camp's Territorial Tax Revolution
Ways and Means Chairman Dave Camp started setting the agenda for a business tax overhaul in 2011with a discussion paper on a territorial tax. This Bloomberg Government Analysis examines Camp's proposal and the impact of a switch to a territorial system.
For the report, go here. (Subscription required.)
For the report, go here. (Subscription required.)
Posted on
Tax Fairness Tops Agenda at European Summit
Facedwith public outrage over tax-evasion scandals at a time of austerity budgets, European leaders pledgedwednesday to ensure that everybody -- from high rollers to big multinationals -- pays their fair share to cash-strapped governments.
But the small steps that leaders took at their Brussels summit underline how difficult it is to effectively fight tax evasion by individuals and tax avoidance by companies at a timewhen countries are also competing for foreign investment.
For the story, go here.
But the small steps that leaders took at their Brussels summit underline how difficult it is to effectively fight tax evasion by individuals and tax avoidance by companies at a timewhen countries are also competing for foreign investment.
For the story, go here.
Posted on
Global Firms' Tax Practices Draw U.K. Ire
The storm brewing over Apple Inc.'s tax practices in the U.S. has already rained down hard in the U.K.,where multinationals including Starbucks Corp., Amazon.com Inc. and Google Inc. have drawn public scorn for the low amounts of taxes they pay here.
Butwhile the U.K. government has pledged to take up tax avoidancewith international bodies such as the Group of Eight leading nations, little has yet been done to change the rules.
For the story, go here.
Butwhile the U.K. government has pledged to take up tax avoidancewith international bodies such as the Group of Eight leading nations, little has yet been done to change the rules.
For the story, go here.
Posted on
Push on corporate tax rules goes global
A global effort to tighten corporate tax rules is gaining momentum as politicians in Europe and the United States take aim at American tech giantswhose savvy use of international tax laws has provoked a public backlash.
A day after a U.S. Senate report slammed Apple's use of Irish regulations to minimize payments to the U.S. government, European heads of state said they hoped for quick action from an international effort to change rules that let companies shelter profits.
For the story, go here.
A day after a U.S. Senate report slammed Apple's use of Irish regulations to minimize payments to the U.S. government, European heads of state said they hoped for quick action from an international effort to change rules that let companies shelter profits.
For the story, go here.
Posted on
Robin Hood tax: A long shot
Robin Hood's modus operandiwas simple and, thanks to Hollywood, is still universally understood.when the financial crisis tipped the global economy into a steep downturn, the English folk herowas the obvious figurehead for a campaign to make the financial sector pay by taxing its day-to-day activities.
“You can draw parallels between the Sheriff of Nottingham and financial services, and Robin Hood redistributed gains back to thosewho needed them, says Simon Chouffot, spokesman for the Robin Hood Tax campaign,whichwas launched in 2010. But implementing afinancial transaction tax is far harder than robbingwicked medieval landlords.
For the story, go here.
“You can draw parallels between the Sheriff of Nottingham and financial services, and Robin Hood redistributed gains back to thosewho needed them, says Simon Chouffot, spokesman for the Robin Hood Tax campaign,whichwas launched in 2010. But implementing afinancial transaction tax is far harder than robbingwicked medieval landlords.
For the story, go here.
Posted on
..Apples Right, Corporate Income Tax Should Be Debated: Pulitzer Prize-Winnng Tax Expert
Apple (AAPL) put a fork in the traditional music industry. Then introduced the iPad, kicking off the demise of the PC market. So, could the corporate income tax system be next?
CEO Tim Cook hopes so. Hewent towashington Tuesday to defend his company's use of tax-haven subsidiaries in places like Ireland. Cook also reiterated that Apple has no plans to bring back over $100 billion in profits stashed overseas, far outside the jurisdiction of the IRS.
Perhaps Cook's star-turn in DCwill bring corporate income tax reform back into the spotlight. He suggested that the IRS should modernize the tax code. And itwasnt so long ago that both candidates for President endorsed some type of change in the corporate tax system. Many economists and tax experts, and of course CEOs, have pushed for more drastic change like eliminating the corporate income tax altogether.
“I think itwould make the system much simpler, says Pulitzer Prize-winning tax expert David Cay Johnston.
For the story, go here.
CEO Tim Cook hopes so. Hewent towashington Tuesday to defend his company's use of tax-haven subsidiaries in places like Ireland. Cook also reiterated that Apple has no plans to bring back over $100 billion in profits stashed overseas, far outside the jurisdiction of the IRS.
Perhaps Cook's star-turn in DCwill bring corporate income tax reform back into the spotlight. He suggested that the IRS should modernize the tax code. And itwasnt so long ago that both candidates for President endorsed some type of change in the corporate tax system. Many economists and tax experts, and of course CEOs, have pushed for more drastic change like eliminating the corporate income tax altogether.
“I think itwould make the system much simpler, says Pulitzer Prize-winning tax expert David Cay Johnston.
For the story, go here.
Posted on
The Apple Tax Diversion
You almost have to admire Carl Levin's timing. Amid a furor over politicized IRS tax enforcement, the Michigan Democrat on Tuesday tried to change the subject to a hardywashington perennial -- corporate tax loopholes. Too bad his designated business pinata, Apple, demonstrates instead the insanity of the tax code that Mr. Levin has done so much towrite.
Mr. Levin unveiled the results of his months-long investigation into Apple's corporate taxes and accused the American business success of employing "alchemy" and "gimmickry" to lower its tax bill.what Mr. Levin did not dowas present any evidence of anything illegal or even inappropriate. He did prove that Apple has smart accountants and tax lawyers.
For the editorial, go here.
Mr. Levin unveiled the results of his months-long investigation into Apple's corporate taxes and accused the American business success of employing "alchemy" and "gimmickry" to lower its tax bill.what Mr. Levin did not dowas present any evidence of anything illegal or even inappropriate. He did prove that Apple has smart accountants and tax lawyers.
For the editorial, go here.
Posted on
Apple Tax Bill Overstated to Investors
Apple Inc.'s real tax bill isn't as big as the one it reports to its investors.
Among the findings of an investigation by the Senate's Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations are figures that show Apple's reported taxes substantially exceed the sum it actually pays the U.S. Treasury.
For the story, go here.
Among the findings of an investigation by the Senate's Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations are figures that show Apple's reported taxes substantially exceed the sum it actually pays the U.S. Treasury.
For the story, go here.
Posted on
Ireland: No Favors Offered To Firms
The Irish government on Tuesday denied it shelters some of theworld's largest corporations, such as Apple Inc., from paying taxes, saying its long-standing low corporation tax regime is transparent and doesn't make it a tax haven.
An investigation by the U.S. Senate has revealed that, through its use of technicalities in Irish and U.S. tax law, Apple has paid little or no corporate taxes on at least $74 billion over the past four years. The investigation found no evidence that Apple did anything illegal.
The report published on Monday by the Senate's Permanent Committee on Investigations said that in Ireland, Apple "has negotiated a special corporate tax rate of less than 2%."
The Irish government said it hadn't negotiated special treatmentwith Apple or any other company.
For the story, go here.
An investigation by the U.S. Senate has revealed that, through its use of technicalities in Irish and U.S. tax law, Apple has paid little or no corporate taxes on at least $74 billion over the past four years. The investigation found no evidence that Apple did anything illegal.
The report published on Monday by the Senate's Permanent Committee on Investigations said that in Ireland, Apple "has negotiated a special corporate tax rate of less than 2%."
The Irish government said it hadn't negotiated special treatmentwith Apple or any other company.
For the story, go here.
Posted on
Apple CEO Tim Cook, Lawmakers Square Off Over Taxes .
Apple Inc.'s tax strategies came under harsh scrutiny Tuesday in the Senate,where lawmakers are finding it far easier to call for a simpler tax code than to produce one.
Tim Cook, Apple's chief executive, defended the technology giant's tax practices,which Senate investigators say have led Apple to pay no corporate taxes on tens of billions of dollars in overseas income over the past four years. He said the company pays all taxes due and argued the U.S. tax code needs a "dramatic simplification."
Mr. Cook's appearance before the Senate's Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations focused both on Apple's practices and the broader question of tax reform. One consistent complaint from large companies is that the U.S. taxes multinational companies on their global earnings,while many others tax only profits earnedwithin a country's borders. That gives U.S. companies reason to park foreign earnings overseas: They are taxed onlywhen brought back to the U.S.
For the story, go here.
Tim Cook, Apple's chief executive, defended the technology giant's tax practices,which Senate investigators say have led Apple to pay no corporate taxes on tens of billions of dollars in overseas income over the past four years. He said the company pays all taxes due and argued the U.S. tax code needs a "dramatic simplification."
Mr. Cook's appearance before the Senate's Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations focused both on Apple's practices and the broader question of tax reform. One consistent complaint from large companies is that the U.S. taxes multinational companies on their global earnings,while many others tax only profits earnedwithin a country's borders. That gives U.S. companies reason to park foreign earnings overseas: They are taxed onlywhen brought back to the U.S.
For the story, go here.
Posted on
Google Joins Apple Avoiding Taxes With Stateless Income
U.S. Senate scrutiny of Apple Inc. (AAPL)s tax strategies turned the spotlight on a unitwith $30 billion in profit since 2009 that's incorporated in Ireland, controlled by a board in California, and doesn't pay taxes in either place.
Apple officials acknowledged yesterday at a congressional hearing that the entity -- a key subsidiary in Apples offshore tax strategy -- is managed and controlled in the U.S., yet it still isnt paying U.S. federal income taxes.
The shifting of profits by multinational companies is costing the U.S. and Europe at least $100 billion per year in lost tax revenue, according to Kimberly Clausing, an economics professor at Reed University in Portland, Oregon.
For the article, go here.
Apple officials acknowledged yesterday at a congressional hearing that the entity -- a key subsidiary in Apples offshore tax strategy -- is managed and controlled in the U.S., yet it still isnt paying U.S. federal income taxes.
The shifting of profits by multinational companies is costing the U.S. and Europe at least $100 billion per year in lost tax revenue, according to Kimberly Clausing, an economics professor at Reed University in Portland, Oregon.
For the article, go here.
Posted on
Cook Defending Apple Puts Loophole-Closing Back on Agenda
A congressional hearing into Apple Inc. (AAPL)'s use of offshore tax shelters called attention to how U.S. companies lower their taxes, and underscored the difficulty Congress confrontswhen trying to end the practice.
The hearing by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations yesterday focused on the $102 billion in assets that Apple, the most valuable U.S. technology company, has stored in offshore entities. Apple executives defended their practices,with Chief Executive Officer Tim Cook saying the company complieswith all laws and has no plans to repatriate earnings kept abroad.
For the story, go here.
The hearing by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations yesterday focused on the $102 billion in assets that Apple, the most valuable U.S. technology company, has stored in offshore entities. Apple executives defended their practices,with Chief Executive Officer Tim Cook saying the company complieswith all laws and has no plans to repatriate earnings kept abroad.
For the story, go here.
Posted on
Tax Evasion: Apple CEO Defends Firm on Tax Payments, Tells Senate Panel No Gimmicks' Were Used
Apple Chief Executive Officer Timothy Cook told the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations that his company pays all the taxes it owes and does not engage in any gimmicks to dodge its obligations, in response to sharp questioning from Chairman Carl Levin (D-Mich.) at a May 21 hearing.We pay all the taxeswe owe. Every single dollar, Cook said at the hearing.we don't depend on tax gimmicks.
For the story, go here. (Subscription required.)
For the story, go here. (Subscription required.)
Posted on
OECD Completes Transfer Pricing Safe Harbor Guidance
The OECD's release of final guidance on transfer pricing safe harbors on May 21 sets the stage for countries to adoptworkable rules to simplify transfer pricing burdens on taxpayers, according to commentators, including Joseph Andrus, head of the OECD transfer pricing unit.
The new OECD transfer pricing safe harbor guidelines replace chapter 4, section E of the OECD's Transfer Pricing Guidelines. The new rules contain relatively few changes from a June 6, 2012, discussion draft but mark a significant shift from the OECD guidelines they replace.
For the article, go here. (Subscription required.)
The new OECD transfer pricing safe harbor guidelines replace chapter 4, section E of the OECD's Transfer Pricing Guidelines. The new rules contain relatively few changes from a June 6, 2012, discussion draft but mark a significant shift from the OECD guidelines they replace.
For the article, go here. (Subscription required.)
Posted on
Apple CEO Advocates Dramatic Reform of Corporate Tax Code
Apple Inc. CEO Tim Cook recommended at a May 21 hearing of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations that the U.S. corporate tax code be dramatically simplified.
Reform should be revenue neutralwhile eliminating corporate tax expenditures, lowering corporate income tax rates, and imposing a reasonable tax on foreign earnings thatwould allow them to be repatriated, Cook said. Apple does notwant a temporary tax holiday either, he added, saying, "A permanent change, to me, is materially better than a short-term tax holiday."
For the story, go here. (Subscription required.)
Reform should be revenue neutralwhile eliminating corporate tax expenditures, lowering corporate income tax rates, and imposing a reasonable tax on foreign earnings thatwould allow them to be repatriated, Cook said. Apple does notwant a temporary tax holiday either, he added, saying, "A permanent change, to me, is materially better than a short-term tax holiday."
For the story, go here. (Subscription required.)
Posted on
Dublin cut tax burden on multinationals after US lobbying
Dublin amended its tax code following lobbying by US industry, reducing the tax burden on multinationals that funnel royalty payments to offshore tax havens, the FT has learnt.
The changes enabled some multinational companies to make royalty payments from their Irish-based operations directly to subsidiaries based in tax havens such as Bermuda or the Cayman Islands,without having to pay a 20 per centwithholding tax on the royalties.
The changes to Ireland's tax code in July 2010 to exempt certain companies from thewithholding taxwere introduced as part of a suite of incentives to boost Ireland's attractiveness as a location for intellectual property.
For the story, go here.
The changes enabled some multinational companies to make royalty payments from their Irish-based operations directly to subsidiaries based in tax havens such as Bermuda or the Cayman Islands,without having to pay a 20 per centwithholding tax on the royalties.
The changes to Ireland's tax code in July 2010 to exempt certain companies from thewithholding taxwere introduced as part of a suite of incentives to boost Ireland's attractiveness as a location for intellectual property.
For the story, go here.
Posted on
Senate PSI posts materials related to Apple hearing
The Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations (PSI) has posted on itswebsite materials related to the May 21 hearing, "Offshore Profit Shifting and the U.S. Tax Code - Part 2 (Apple Inc.)." These materials includewitness statements, a PSI memo, and a variety of documents supplied by Apple.
For the materials, go here.
For the materials, go here.
Posted on
Apple Holds Billions of Dollars in Foreign Tax Havens
An analysis of Apple Inc.'s financial reports makes clear that Apple has paid almost no income taxes to any country on its $102 billion in offshore cash holdings. That means that this cash hoard reflects profits thatwere shifted, on paper, out of countrieswhere the profitswere actually earned into foreign tax havens.
For the CTJ report, go here.
For the CTJ report, go here.
Posted on
Apple Used Tax Loopholes to Avoid $9 Billion, Senators Say
Apple Inc. Chief Executive Officer Tim Cookwill face off against U.S. senators leveling accusations the iPhone maker has created aweb of offshore entities to avoid paying billions of dollars in U.S. taxes.
Cook and two other executives -- including Chief Financial Officer Peter Oppenheimer -- appear at 9:30 a.m.washington time before a Senate panel that yesterday released a report saying the company's subsidiaries include three entities that have no home country for tax purposes.
“Applewasnt satisfiedwith shifting its profits to a low-tax offshore tax haven, Democratic Senator Carl Levin of Michigan, chairman of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, said at a news conference yesterday.
For the story, go here.
Cook and two other executives -- including Chief Financial Officer Peter Oppenheimer -- appear at 9:30 a.m.washington time before a Senate panel that yesterday released a report saying the company's subsidiaries include three entities that have no home country for tax purposes.
“Applewasnt satisfiedwith shifting its profits to a low-tax offshore tax haven, Democratic Senator Carl Levin of Michigan, chairman of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, said at a news conference yesterday.
For the story, go here.
Posted on
Apples Web of Tax Shelters Saved It Billions, Panel Finds
Even as Apple became the nation's most profitable technology company, it avoided billions in taxes in the United States and around theworld through aweb of subsidiaries so complex it spanned continents andwent beyond anything most experts had ever seen, Congressional investigators disclosed on Monday.
The investigation is expected to set up a potentially explosive confrontation between a bipartisan group of lawmakers and Timothy D. Cook, Apple's chief executive, at a public hearing on Tuesday.
Congressional investigators found that some of Apple's subsidiaries had no employees andwere largely run by top officials from the company's headquarters in Cupertino, Calif. But by officially locating them in places like Ireland, Applewas able to, in effect, make them stateless -- exempt from taxes, record-keeping laws and the need for the subsidiaries to even file tax returns anywhere in theworld.
For the story, go here.
The investigation is expected to set up a potentially explosive confrontation between a bipartisan group of lawmakers and Timothy D. Cook, Apple's chief executive, at a public hearing on Tuesday.
Congressional investigators found that some of Apple's subsidiaries had no employees andwere largely run by top officials from the company's headquarters in Cupertino, Calif. But by officially locating them in places like Ireland, Applewas able to, in effect, make them stateless -- exempt from taxes, record-keeping laws and the need for the subsidiaries to even file tax returns anywhere in theworld.
For the story, go here.
Posted on
Apple Avoided Taxes on Overseas Billions, Senate Panel Finds .
Apple Inc. paid no corporate income tax to any national government on tens of billions of dollars in overseas income over the past four years, Senate investigators found, a revelation that fuels the debate overwhether the U.S. tax code needs an overhaul.
The disclosure follows a lengthy examination of the technology giant's tax practices by the U.S. Senate's Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations,which is expected to air its findings at a hearing on Tuesday. Apple Chief Executive Tim Cook is preparing to testify at the hearing, and is expected to propose changes to a tax code that provides American companies strong incentives to keep overseas earnings bottled up at foreign subsidiaries.
Apple used technicalities in Irish and American tax law to pay little or no corporate taxes on at least $74 billion over the past four years, according to the Senate panel's findings. The investigation found no evidence that Apple did anything illegal. Aides to the subcommittee said they have never seen a company use a subsidiary that didn't owe corporate income taxes to any country.
For the story, go here.
The disclosure follows a lengthy examination of the technology giant's tax practices by the U.S. Senate's Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations,which is expected to air its findings at a hearing on Tuesday. Apple Chief Executive Tim Cook is preparing to testify at the hearing, and is expected to propose changes to a tax code that provides American companies strong incentives to keep overseas earnings bottled up at foreign subsidiaries.
Apple used technicalities in Irish and American tax law to pay little or no corporate taxes on at least $74 billion over the past four years, according to the Senate panel's findings. The investigation found no evidence that Apple did anything illegal. Aides to the subcommittee said they have never seen a company use a subsidiary that didn't owe corporate income taxes to any country.
For the story, go here.
Posted on
Apple Testimony for 5/21 PSI Hearing
The May 21written testimony of Apple Inc. before the US Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations is now available.
For the testimony, go here.
For the testimony, go here.
Posted on
Former employee ready to expose Googles tax plans
Google's tax planning has been brandedimmoral by a former employeewho told a Sunday newspaper hewas ready to hand over evidence to the tax authority thatwould expose the company's arrangements as aconcocted scheme.
Barney Jones, a Google sales executive from 2002 to 2006,went publicwith some of the testimony behind lastweek's parliamentary hearing,which prompted Margaret Hodge, chair of the public accounts committee, to label the company asevil.
For the story, go here.
Barney Jones, a Google sales executive from 2002 to 2006,went publicwith some of the testimony behind lastweek's parliamentary hearing,which prompted Margaret Hodge, chair of the public accounts committee, to label the company asevil.
For the story, go here.
Posted on
Apple faces grilling over US tax rate
Applewould have paid a tax rate of about 15 per cent last year, far below the 25.2 per cent it reported, had it not used a form of reserve accounting that sets it apart from other big US technology companies.
The rare accounting treatment has helped to distract attention from Apple at a timewhen the tax-avoidance strategies of other cash-rich US tech companies, notably Google, have come under public attack, according to tax experts.
However, Apple's tax planning is likely to come under the microscope on Tuesdaywhen Tim Cook, chief executive, appears before the US Senate's permanent investigations subcommittee.
For the story, go here.
The rare accounting treatment has helped to distract attention from Apple at a timewhen the tax-avoidance strategies of other cash-rich US tech companies, notably Google, have come under public attack, according to tax experts.
However, Apple's tax planning is likely to come under the microscope on Tuesdaywhen Tim Cook, chief executive, appears before the US Senate's permanent investigations subcommittee.
For the story, go here.
Member Companies
