Posted on
OECD clarifies when dividend recipients are beneficial owners
Posted on
OECD: US should drop tax favoritism for investing abroad, cut corporate rates
Posted on
IRS closes 70 APAs, could top 100 by year's end, official predicts
Posted on
G-20 Asks OECD to review rules with goal of curbing profit shifting
Posted on
Inquiry into tech giants' tax strategies nears end
Posted on
India to Western tech firms: to sell it here, build it here
The proposed regulations,whichwere reviewed by Thewall Street
Journal,would create an expansive "Buy India" mandate requiring a large
percentage of the high-tech goods sold in the country to be
manufactured locally.
For the full article, go here.
Posted on
CRS examines tax cuts on repatriation earnings as economic stimulus
Posted on
CBO reviews options for taxing US multinational corporations
Posted on
UK.s biggest companies lower tax rate with overseas business
Posted on
More US service jobs heading offshore
Posted on
Bernstein: Corporate tax reform should be revenue positive
Posted on
US productivity climbs, but wages stagnate
Posted on
France, Germany to pool revenue from FTT to fund programs aimed at competitiveness
Posted on
Finland to restrict interest deductions, offer temporary relief on depreciation
Posted on
EU parliament OKs special legislative procedure for EU financial transactions tax
Posted on
Economic substance needed to weigh third-party behavior, OECD's de Ruiter says
Posted on
European Court of Justice rules against UK tax imputation method on foreign dividends
Posted on
European Commission to launch new plan against tax havens, corporate loopholes
Posted on
Danish Parliament OKs law allowing publication of companies' tax details
Posted on
Motion introduced to implement 2012 federal budget tax measures in Canada
Posted on
Burden of proof placed on taxpayers when French profits moved outside EU
Posted on
Earnings shocks and tax-motivated income-shifting: evidence from European multinationals
Posted on
Oxford Centre for Business Taxation presents its annual ranking of G20 nations' corporate taxes
Posted on
A better way to tax US businesses
Posted on
CTJ: 286 Fortune 500 companies hold $1.6 trillion in offshore profits
Posted on
Which Fortune 500 companies are sheltering income in overseas tax havens?
Posted on
CRS examines US federal tax benefits for manufacutring
Posted on
CRS examines options for reform of US corporate income tax system
Posted on
CRS examines US international tax reform alternatives
Posted on
Accountant testifies at hearing on offshore profit-shifting and the US tax code
Posted on
Corporate tax competitiveness rankings for 2012
Posted on
International tax practitioner testifies at hearing on offshore profit-shifting and the US tax code
Posted on
Camp, Hatch call on business community to embrace comprehensive tax reform
Posted on
To tax, or not to tax, overseas cash hoards
Posted on
American companies and global supply networks: driving US economic growth and jobs by connecting with the world
Posted on
As anger over alleged tax avoidance rises, British MPs vow action on multinationals
Posted on
Tax competition and the trend toward territoriality
Posted on
Avi-Yonah testifies at hearing on offshore profit-shifting and the US tax code
Posted on
Avi-Yonah makes case for equalizing tax rates applied to capital and labor
Posted on
Australian Business Tax Working Group issues final report on possible corporate rate cut
Posted on
Base erosion and profit shifting (2)
Posted on
Tax Reforms and Corporate Tax Competition
Posted on
Is U.S. Multinational Dividend Repatriation Policy Influenced by Reporting Incentives?
A study in the September 2012 issue of the American Accounting Association journal The Accounting Review concludes that an accounting technique known as permanently reinvested earnings, or PRE, reduces multinational firms' repatriation of foreign affiliates' earnings (through dividends paid to U.S. parent firms) by roughly 20% a year.while acknowledging that high U.S corporate tax rates and the ability to defer payment play a major role in keeping earnings abroad, it finds that "repatriation is more sensitive to the repatriation tax rate in the presence of reporting incentives," so much so that "firmswith high reporting incentives repatriate, on average, 16.6% to 21.4% less per year than firmswith low reporting incentives."
"Our study suggests that companieswould repatriate about 20% more than they currently do if they didn't have this accounting tool that enables them to put a gloss on their financial statements," comments Leslie A. Robinson, an accounting professor at Dartmouth College,who carried out the studywith Prof. Linda Krull of the University of Oregon and Prof. Jennifer Blouin of the University of Pennsylvania.
For a press release on the article, go here
For the full article, go here
Posted on
Treasury official: US tax reform efforts must be informed by international fight against base erosion
Posted on
Designing an "ironclad" US territorial tax system will be difficult, Shay says
Posted on
Why advanced manufacturers need tax reform
Posted on
Durst suggests changes to OECD guidance on transfer pricing for intangibles
Posted on
UK and German Finance Ministers call for corporate tax coordination
Posted on
US corporate taxes: myths and facts
Posted on
Kleinbard examines tax policy implications of "stateless income"