2023

Spain is seeking comments on legislation to implement a 15% minimum tax on corporations as part of the global OECD-backed tax deal. The Finance Ministry that it would implement the European Union directive on the minimum tax adopted late last year.

The House of Commons Treasury Committee, BDO and ICAEW have all been urging Chancellor Jeremy Hunt to provide more clarity on tax relief schemes and to reduce corporation tax rates in order to boost the U.K. economy in his upcoming budget on March 15.

The International Accounting Standards Board must quickly approve a proposed temporary accounting exception for deferred taxes arising from the OECD global minimum tax framework, in order to meet the Japanese Diet's passage of pillar 2 rules, prior to the global enactment of these rules by many countries by July 20.

Harbour Energy plc's CEO has indicated that due to the U.K. energy profits levy and business headwinds, the company is set to realize around $40 million in annual savings from the reduction in U.K. activity, with further adjustments expected in the second half of 2023.

The European Commission is allowing member states to match support measures from third countries, such as those in the US Inflation Reduction Act, in order to prevent company relocation and support the production of key components.

The insurance industry has called for a delay in the United Kingdom's planned implementation of the OECD-brokered global corporate tax reform plan in order to ensure that the reforms are workable on a global level.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen travels to Washington to discuss the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act with President Biden. At the same time, the EU puts together a multilayered response to the act as it threatens EU competitiveness and ensures it has sufficient net-zero technology manufacturing capacity to reach its climate objectives.

Italy's decision to pursue Facebook for VAT on grounds that the website's users are providing information in exchange for its services is challenging the accepted notion that "if you're not paying for a product, then you are the product" and potentially raising new questions about taxation and digital services

Belgium expects over €2 billion in tax revenue from pillar 2 of the global tax plan, which would partially finance their tax reform to shift taxes away from labor, with estimates for €634 million in 2024, €714 million in 2025, and €748 million in 2026. According to estimates linked to the government's latest tax reform proposal, which is expected to raise €14 million in 2024, cost €14 million in 2025, and bring in €114 million in 2026 thanks to the benefits expected from the reform, including increased consumption and labor participation.

The European Parliament’s Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs has adopted an opinion on using passerelle clauses. These EU treaty articles would allow moving from the special legislative procedure to the ordinary one, allowing changes to the procedure without a lengthy and politically difficult treaty change.

Internet tolls proposed by telco companies and supported by the European Telecommunications Network Operators' Association and Axon Partners Group could see online services like Netflix, Spotify, and Amazon forced to pay towards network costs, which critics say are unnecessary and could violate net neutrality. This comes after a report from consulting firm Oxera, commissioned by the Dutch government, exploring the effects a "fair share" or "bandwidth use" levy would have, with the government stating it would not be effective in promoting network investment and users could be forced to pay more for online services.

EU Internal Market Commissioner Thierry Breton has announced the start of an exploratory consultation on the future of the electronic communications sector and its infrastructure, stating that a contributions mechanism could be one way to ensure that digital players like content and application providers help pay for the necessary infrastructure investments.

US Treasury and the IRS have issued final regulations to treat a consolidated group that includes controlled foreign corporations as a single entity when calculating the group’s required foreign income inclusions by addressing how they must treat distributions of previously taxed earnings and profits under section 959(b) to upper-tier CFCs within the group when calculating the amount that must be included in gross income under subpart F and the global intangible low-taxed income regime.

South Korea became the first country to implement domestic legislation adopting the Pillar Two global anti-base-erosion rules, also known as GLOBE, in its amended Law for the Coordination of International Tax Affairs. Japan's ruling coalition submitted draft legislation for a new IIR to the Diet, which would take effect for fiscal years starting on or after April 1, 2024; the legislation package focuses on the IIR and GLOBE information return but doesn't provide a timeline for adopting a UTPR or QDMTT.

Belgian Finance Minister Vincent Van Peteghem proposed broad tax reform on March 2 that included a global minimum tax on multinational companies. Some of the measures are aimed to start on January 1 but could be subject to changes after the government comes to an agreement on the reform package.

Ireland recently launched a tax incentive program aimed at boosting investment and cultural awareness. The program took effect in January and offered a refundable corporation tax of as much as €8 million for expenditures on qualifying projects. As a result, some video game developers are showing an interest in Ireland.

Portuguese utility EDP-Energies de Portugal SA, one of Europe’s largest renewable energy companies, is planning to build more wind turbines in the United State because of the tax credits from the Inflation Reduction Act. Chief Executive Officer Miguel Stilwell de Andrade, on March 2, said, “The Inflation Reduction Act is so powerful and promotes investment,” and that “Europe needs to do things that are similar to this, but Europe seems to be more interested in tariffs and taxings things.”

Countries’ domestic implementation of new global minimum tax rules will be evaluated starting this year, an OECD official said on February 27. A peer review process will look at how countries are applying the 15% minimum tax rules known as Pillar Two as they are in the process of being drafted. As for Pillar One, country delegates are negotiating the final details of Amount A with a view to having a multilateral convention ready for countries to sign by mid-2023.

The IRS issued final rules on February 22 that treat companies that are part of a consolidated group as a single entity for purposes of computing their share of certain foreign income. The rules (RIN 1545-BQ51) under I.R.C. Section 951(a)(2)(B) are meant to ensure that companies do not gain an advantage by shifting around the location of ownership of a foreign corporation’s stock from one entity to another within the group.

Hong Kong Financial Secretary Paul Chan said on February 22 that Hong Kong will implement the 15% minimum corporate tax rate in 2025 in accordance with the OECD-led agreement. The change is expected to raise HK$15 billion ($1.9 billion) in tax revenue annually.

After the European Union agreed in late 2022 on a directive requiring all its member countries to adopt the Pillar Two rules by the end of 2023, a wave of other countries have begun to follow. Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and other jurisdictions are moving forward with legislation. Danish Mehboob and Isabel Gottlieb summarize steps taken in the European Union, the United States, South Korea, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, Japan, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, and South Africa.

The OECD is calling for support from the G-20 finance ministers to conclude negotiations on part of the global tax deal by mid-2023. Several aspects of Pillar One's implementation are still being negotiated, such as Pillar One's Amount A and Amount B. Countries are trying to reach a compromise in time to sign an STTR multilateral treaty instrument by mid-2023.

Tayo Ogungbenro and Israel Ajayi explain Nigeria's position on the OECD's Pillar One and Pillar Two solution. Nigeria withheld its agreement to the global agreement after the chairman of the Nigeria Revenue Authority stated in May 2022 that the solution would negatively impact the country's fiscal revenue. Nigeria has instead designed a home-grown alternative to protect its tax base that has been shown to improve the country's tax-to-GDP ratio.

U.S. state and local governments have agreed to give out at least $1 billion in subsidies in 2022. The subsidies went to companies in return for opening factories within those jurisdictions. A primary reason for the incentives is that there are more projects under way as manufacturers are looking to move factories to the United States and producers of electric vehicles, batteries, computer chips, and solar panels are racing to find U.S. sites to meet demand and receive federal subsidies.

The Inflation Reduction Act provided $50 billion in tax credits to entice Americans to buy electric vehicles assembled in North America. To qualify for the subsidies, a portion of the materials used to make the batteries must come from nations that have free trade agreements with the United States. European and Asian countries have complained that the subsidies are protectionist actions that will lead to a global subsidy war. To ease these concerns with U.S. allies, Treasury Secretary Janet L. Yellen said on February 24 that a possible solution could be new agreements that would allow these countries to qualify as a free trade partner.

Against the background of existing US international tax rules on the operation of Controlled Foreign Corporations, Prof Repetti considers two tax regulations which in his view have created significant tax incentives for MNEs to move manufacturing outside the U.S. Prof. Repetti argues that the CTB regulations and the Subpart F manufacturing exception have contributed to the loss of 5 million manufacturing jobs, the closure of more than 91,000 plants since 1997 and posits that the job losses increased racial and economic inequality and stressed our political system. He makes a case for the amendment of the regulations to reduce or eliminate the tax incentives for offshoring by preventing the use of foreign contract manufacturers and disallowing MNEs from disregarding their wholly owned foreign entities.

Avi-Yonah in this piece reviews the international tax regime in the aftermath of the 1923 Report on Double Taxation after a century. Avi-Yonah notes that while on the surface the changes brought about by the BEPS project seem radical enough to consider them an “international tax revolution”, the principles developed in the Report are still influential a hundred years later.

Ajmera and Nemane explore the potential role of the tax in moulding climate change in line with the commitments assumed by countries under the 2015 Paris Agreement. The writers interrogate the issue of whether the imposition of carbon tax or restructuring tax rates can have a significant impact in regulating carbon emissions by rationally pushing consumers, investors, and producers, towards an environmentally sound direction. In response, Ajmera and Nemane in their paper, review three carbon-tax implementation case studies, to wit: British Columbia, South Africa, and the revision of European Union Energy Taxation Directive in the context of aviation, in order to explore the scope of contributing factors – from adequate tax rate determination to optimum tax revenue use – in successfully curbing carbon-based emissions. Ajmera and Nemane propose a suggestive policy model of carbon-tax in the wake of COVID-19 pandemic, as the way forward in ensuring global carbon-neutrality.

Concerns are growing among EU officials that the various issues surrounding the energy taxation directive (ETD) review could lead to a less ambitious text or jeopardize its adoption, with countries having different priorities and sectors they wish to protect.

The US Treasury has expressed concerns to Australia's Treasury over the ATO draft ruling TR2021/D4, which could create an imbalance in the benefits provided by the Australia-US tax treaty and potentially impose Australian royalty withholding tax on software re-seller arrangements.

The High Court of Karnataka's decision in The Director of Income Tax (International Taxation) v. IBM India Pvt. Ltd. relieves multinational companies in similar circumstances, recognizing the tax principles under the double taxation avoidance agreement between India and the Philippines.

The OECD is revising the MNE guidelines, a set of soft-law standards governing multinational corporate behavior, and is also working on a legally binding standard for due diligence for MNEs, focusing on binding regulations and coordination to ensure companies respect guidelines for responsible business conduct.

A Spanish court has ruled that a €250,000 minimum threshold for documenting low-value related-party transactions did not absolve Ingersoll-Rand's Spanish subsidiary from performing and recording an arm's-length test for an intercompany loan while also upholding the tax authorities' disallowance of the loss from the sale of Hussmann Koxka to a third party.

The United Nations is seeking feedback, which it will collect through March 10, on what will come out of a resolution calling for increased international tax cooperation. The feedback will be used in informal briefings and consultations for the preparation of the secretary-general’s report, which is expected in September.

New guidance on the book-income minimum tax (Notice 2023-20), issued on February 17, aimed at preventing “significant distortions” that could hurt the insurance industry. The guidance addresses situations in which the interplay of financial accounting rules and the new corporate alternative minimum tax could have harmful consequences for insurers. This is the second attempt by Treasury and the IRS to provide guidance on determining and implementing the new book tax. Comments on the guidance in the notice are due by April 3.

Demand for online shopping has added pressure on developing countries to enhance their value-added tax systems. The OECD noted that this trend is expected to continue to at least 2025. However, VAT is not collected in many countries under eixsting rules. To help, the OECD published the VAT Digital Toolkit for Africa on February 15, the third in a series of toolkits that cover all types of e-commerce activities for Africa, Asia-Pacific, and Latin America.

Witnesses at a hearing told the IRS and the Treasury Department that there is still more that needs to be done with the much-debated foreign tax credit regulations. Cost recovery and foreign royalty withholding taxes need more changes beyond those made in November’s proposed regulations. Specifically, calls are being made to define the scope of a new proposed test indicating that recovery of “substantially all” of certain costs is sufficient to qualify for the credit and for more clarity in the attribution requirement for royalties.

On February 15, the OECD said that annual tax revenue under the two-pillar global tax deal could reach $200 billion. This is twice the original forecast. Pierce O’Reilly, head of the Business and International Taxes Unit at the OECD, said that changes in the design of the proposed plan, as well as better data and modeling, contributed to the increase in projected tax revenue.

Panelists at a 2023 OECD Tax and Development Days event on February 16 said that resource-rich developing countries need to reconsider tax incentives for international mining companies in light of Pillar II. The incentives could result in a transfer of tax from the producing country to the country where the parent company is located. This would occur through top-up tax that would be charged by the jurisdiction of the mining company’s ultimate parent, in the event of producing countries not taxing heavily enough.

The Tax Foundation has published a summary of country-level revenue estimates for Pillar II. Seven countries have produced individual estimates of corporate tax revenue increases resulting from the international agreement. These estimates range from 2% in the Netherlands to 12% in France. The OECD previously estimated that the Pillar II rules will raise corporate tax revenue by 9% and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) estimated that it would be closer to 5.7%.

Kuzniacki in this paper attempts to demonstrate that the introduction of a legal definition of aggressive tax planning (ATP) together with anti-ATP rules by the European Commission under Securing the Activity Framework of Enablers (SAFE) initiative is an example of legislative inflation of anti-tax avoidance rules. The objective of the article is to show that the legal use of Aggressive Tax Planning (ATP) would add another factor for further disorder in interpretating and applying existing concepts and anti-abusive rules in the EU law as well as triggers risk of over-reaction. The paper also considers the possibility of a new specific anti-avoidance rules based on economic substance.

Noonan and Plekhanova in this paper address the Two Pillar approach as a response to the tax challenges of the digital economy. The authors note specifically that the two-pillar solution is a complex package which foresees new binding and non-binding international instruments, amendments to hundreds of existing tax treaties, and enactment of new national tax laws. In view of concerns about the implementation, coherence, and fairness of the rules of the two-pillar solution, this article suggests that a fuller understanding of the likely impact of the two pillar solution requires looking beyond the four walls of the TPS documentation. The writers argue that following an evaluation of the likely impact, and a contemplation of the legal basis of the components for implementation of the Two Pillar Solution, the enthusiasm of states to endorse the October 2021 Statement on the Two Pillar Solution may not carry through to its implementation and compliance. The authors opine that there are reasons to doubt both broad and high levels of implementation and compliance and ultimately the sustainability of the Two Pillar Solution in the longer-term.

Magalhaes and Christians examine the myths of international tax law and demonstrate that each purported impediment to its operation is either conceptually under-theorized or exaggerated in legal impact or both. They note that the minimum tax initiative as it has progressed is flawed and argue that the mythical international law norms offered by critics do nothing toward achieving improvements but only seek to undermine the underlying goals of the initiative as a whole. They opine that to the extent curbing base erosion and profit shifting by the largest corporations would bring about a more stable and mutually acceptable world order, the use of mythological international law to forestall reform should be abandoned in favor of cooperative problem-solving.

Rep. Jason Smith (R., Mo.), the chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, said that the international agreement to raise minimum taxes on corporations will not be accepted by Republicans in Congress. Mr. Smith warned that House Republicans will pursue tax and trade countermeasures. A spokesperson for the OECD said that a response would be offered to Mr. Smith’s letter.

This piece reviews the relationship between international taxation and foreign direct investment (‘FDI’). Relying on micro-level data on inbound FDI relations in Germany, it concludes that a higher tax burden on income earned in a corporate subsidiary increases the probability that a multinational corporation conducts foreign investment through a non-corporate flow-through. It also examines potential real effects of organizational form choices and documents that affiliates established as flow-throughs exhibit a lower loss propensity and are less profitable than affiliates established as corporate subsidiaries.

Marisa Ouro considers the impact of tax rules on the activities of digital nomads in moving from country to country whilst remaining an employee. The paper interrogates the constraints and incentives for this geographical freedom from three perspectives, namely: (x) Corporate Income Taxation (CIT), and (y) Personal Income Taxation, both analyzed under Portuguese domestic law and the OECD Model Convention as well as the relationship between States, addressing both tax competition and cooperation between States.

This paper considers the variety of climate policies applicable across countries, with some countries imposing stringent emissions policies and others doing very little. The writers posit that the variance in approaches creates incentive leakages and proceeds to consider solutions to the leakage problem based on its tax analytical model.

Yonah and Wells consider the new corporate alternative minimum tax regime in the United States and argues that the corporate alternative minimum tax enacted as part of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 puts the United States in a better position than current law, and arguably even better than would a tax reform package that included a conforming global intangible low-taxed income regime but no book-based corporate minimum tax.

Following the work of the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework and the release of its Pillar II administrative guidance, Wardell-Burrus considers this administrative guidance specifically as it relates to the GILTI regime as a CFC tax Regime; the QDMTT which applies before CFC taxes; and the new allocation mechanism of GILTI as a blended CFC Tax. He concludes that the fact that the QDMTT applies before CFC Regimes means that there can be a competitive downside to adopting a QDMTT.