2013

Posted on

CRS examines US federal tax benefits for manufacutring

In a September 20 report, Gary Guenther, an Analyst in Public Financewith the Congressional Research Service, examines "Federal Tax Benefits for Manufacturing:
Current Law, Legislative Proposals, and Issues for the 112th Congress."

For the full text of Guenther's report, go here.

Posted on

CRS examines options for reform of US corporate income tax system

In a September 13 report, Mark P. Keightley, a Specialist in Economicswith the Congressional Research Service (CRS), and Molly F. Sherlock, a Specialist in Public Financewith the CRS, examine the current US corporate income tax system and options for reform of that system.

For the full text of the report, go here.

Posted on

CRS examines US international tax reform alternatives

In a December 27 report, Jane G. Gravelle, a Senior Specialist in Economic Policywith the Congressional Research Service, assesses the existing US international tax regime and examines possible revisions to that regime.

For the full text of the report, go here.

Posted on

Accountant testifies at hearing on offshore profit-shifting and the US tax code

Jack T. Ciesielski, CPA, CFA, the president of R.G. Associates, Inc., an investment research and management firm in Baltimore, testified at the September 20, 2012, hearing of the US Senate Finance Committee Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations on "Offshore Profit Shifting and the U.S. Tax Code."

To read Ciesielski's testimony and that of the otherwitnesses, go here.

Posted on

Corporate tax competitiveness rankings for 2012

Writing in the September 2012 issue of the Cato Institute Tax & Budget Bulletin, Duanjie Chen and Jack Mintz of the University of Calgary School of Public Policy present new estimates of marginal effective tax rates (METRs) on corporate investment for
90 countries.

For their report, go here.

Posted on

International tax practitioner testifies at hearing on offshore profit-shifting and the US tax code

Beth Carr, an international tax services partnerwith Ernst & Young LLP, testified at the September 20, 2012, hearing of the US Senate Finance Committee Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations on "Offshore Profit Shifting and the U.S. Tax Code."

To read Carr's testimony and that of the otherwitnesses, go here.

Posted on

Camp, Hatch call on business community to embrace comprehensive tax reform

In a December 14 letter to the heads of the Business Roundtable and the National Federation of Independent Business, Houseways and Means Chairman Dave Camp and Senate Finance Committee Ranking Minority Member Orrin Hatch reaffirm their support for comprehensive tax reform, as opposed to a corporate-only tax reform approach.

For the letter, go here.

Posted on

To tax, or not to tax, overseas cash hoards

In a Bloomberg Businessweek article, Elizabeth Dwoskin reports on the debate over how US companies are taxed on overseas profits.


For the full text of the article, go here.

Posted on

American companies and global supply networks: driving US economic growth and jobs by connecting with the world

In an extensive report sponsored by the Business Roundtable, the United States Council for International Business, and the United States Council Foundation,Dartmouth Professor Matthew J. Slaughter explainswhat American companies must do to
succeed in todays dynamic global economy.

For the full text of the prepublication version of Professor Slaughter's report, go here.

Posted on

As anger over alleged tax avoidance rises, British MPs vow action on multinationals

The UK Parliament's Public Accounts Committee at a November 12 hearing grilled executives from Google Inc., Amazon.com Inc., and Starbucks Corp. over their transfer pricing policies, suggesting that the companieswere engaged in shifting income out of the U.K. to tax havens.

For coverage of the hearing, go here.

Posted on

Tax competition and the trend toward territoriality

In a new two-page paper, University of Michigan Law School Professor Reuven Avi-Yonah examines the key aspects of the recent trend toward territorial taxation, includingthe easewithwhich this tax competition allows multinational corporations to avoid taxation in the countries inwhich their goods are produced, and how the correct reforms to CFC rules, togetherwith enhanced transfer pricing enforcement, can minimize the harm the trend toward tax competition can inflict on the stability of the US corporate tax base.

For the abstract of Avi-Yonah's paper, and to download the full text of the paper, go here.

Posted on

Avi-Yonah testifies at hearing on offshore profit-shifting and the US tax code

University of Michigan Law School Professor testified at the September 20, 2012, hearing of the US Senate Finance Committee Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations on "Offshore Profit Shifting and the U.S. Tax Code."

To read Avi-Yonah's testimony and that of the otherwitnesses, go here.

Posted on

Avi-Yonah makes case for equalizing tax rates applied to capital and labor

In U. of Michigan Law & Econ Research Paper No. 12-008, University of Michigan Law School Professor Reuven Avi-Yonah responds towhat he sees as a central premise of tax scholarship of the last 30 years -- the greater mobility of capital than labor. Recently, Avi-Yonah notes, scholars such as Edward Kleinbard have recommended that the US adopt a variant of the 'dual income tax' model used by the Scandinavian countries, underwhich income from capital is subject to significantly lower rates than labor income because of its supposedly greater mobility.

Avi-Yonah argues that the premise uponwhich this argument is built is mistaken, because for individual US taxpayers (as opposed to corporations), there are significant limitations on their ability to avoid tax by moving their capital overseas.

For the abstract of this paper, and to download the paper, go here.

Posted on

Australian Business Tax Working Group issues final report on possible corporate rate cut

  • By Business Tax Working Group
The Australian Treasury's Business Taxworking Group (BTWG), established in 2011 to exploreways inwhich a corporate tax cut could be funded fromwithin the business tax system, has issued its final report, concluding that itwas "unable to recommend a revenue neutral package to lower the company tax rate."

For the full text of the BTWG Final Report, go here.

Posted on

Base erosion and profit shifting (2)

Writing in the June 2012 issue of theworld Commerce Review, Masatsugu Asakawa, the Chair of the OECD Committee on Fiscal Affairs and Japan's Deputy Vice-Minister of Finance for International Affairs, explainswhy recent events in the financial sector indicate that corporate tax policy, and in particular its international side, may need a new look.

Asakawa concludes that "It is more important now than ever that taxpayers pay the
right amount of tax at the right time and in the right place."

For the full text of the article, go here.

Posted on

Tax Reforms and Corporate Tax Competition

In an unpublished paper, Professors Rosanne Altshuler of Rutgers University and Timothy Goodspeed of the Hunter College and Graduate Center, CUNY, examine the relationship between tax reforms and corporate tax competition. The authors note that corporate tax competition is an important issuewith broad ramifications for tax policy, yet economists have precious little empirical insight into the tax competition process,which normally manifests itself in large tax reforms.

For the full text of the paper, go here.

Posted on

Is U.S. Multinational Dividend Repatriation Policy Influenced by Reporting Incentives?

A study in the September 2012 issue of the American Accounting Association journal The Accounting Review concludes that an accounting technique known as permanently reinvested earnings, or PRE, reduces multinational firms' repatriation of foreign affiliates' earnings (through dividends paid to U.S. parent firms) by roughly 20% a year.while acknowledging that high U.S corporate tax rates and the ability to defer payment play a major role in keeping earnings abroad, it finds that "repatriation is more sensitive to the repatriation tax rate in the presence of reporting incentives," so much so that "firmswith high reporting incentives repatriate, on average, 16.6% to 21.4% less per year than firmswith low reporting incentives."

"Our study suggests that companieswould repatriate about 20% more than they currently do if they didn't have this accounting tool that enables them to put a gloss on their financial statements," comments Leslie A. Robinson, an accounting professor at Dartmouth College,who carried out the studywith Prof. Linda Krull of the University of Oregon and Prof. Jennifer Blouin of the University of Pennsylvania.

For a press release on the article, go here

For the full article, go here

Member Companies

Back to top